PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Ali Jagirani vs Province of Sindh through Home Secretary Sindh Secretariat Government of Sindh, Karachi S — 2026 MLD 599 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2026 MLD 599 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Muhammad Ali Jagirani vs Province of Sindh through Home Secretary Sindh Secretariat Government of Sindh, Karachi S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 497---B; S. 497; S. 23; Narcotic Substances Act (VIII of 2024); Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Ali Jagirani VS Province of Sindh through Home Secretary Sindh Secretariat Government of Sindh, Karachi S. 497---Bail---Observations of the Court---Scope---Observations recorded in bail order are tentative in nature and shall not, in any manner, prejudice or influence the Trial Court during the adjudication of the case. Citation Name: 2026 MLD 599 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Ali Jagirani VS Province of Sindh through Home Secretary Sindh Secretariat Government of Sindh, Karachi S. 497 (2)---Sindh Control of Narcotic Substances Act (VIII of 2024), 9(1), Sr. No.3(c)---Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)---Possession of narcotic substance and illicit weapon---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Allegation against the petitioner was that 1530-grams charas was recovered from his possession---Allegedly, the petitioner had been nominated in the FIR and recovery of 1530 grams of contraband substance, viz. charas, was shown to have been effected from his possession---However, the punishment provided by law for the said offence is imprisonment which may be extend to fourteen years but shall not be less than nine years---When the statue provided two punishments, then lesser one was to be considered at bail stage---Hence, the alleged offence with which the petitioner was charged did not fall within the ambit of prohibitory clause of S.497,Cr.P.C., thus making bail the rule and jail the exception---Furthermore, the non-association of private mashirs in such circumstances undermined the credibility of the prosecution case---Additionally, no video recording or photographic evidence of the recovery proceedings had been placed on record, despite the availability of technology and the statutory expectation of transparency under such circumstances---In cases hinging solely on police testimony, the benefit of doubt must be afforded to the accused, even at the bail stage---In the circumstances and in view of legal as well as factual position of record the petitioner had succeeded to make out a good prima facie case for grant of bail---Bail petition was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English