PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Abdul Rasheed vs State Ss — 2026 MLD 649 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 MLD 649 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Abdul Rasheed vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Abdul Rasheed VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 337-F(iii), 337-L(2), 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qal-i-amd, ghayr-jaifah-mutalahimah, causing hurt, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Medical evidence corroborating the prosecution case---Scope---Accused were charged for assaulting complainant party, due to which one person died whereas three sustained firearm injuries---Medical evidence was adduced through Medical Officer, who testified that the dead body was received at the mortuary at 08:00 p.m., and the post-mortem examination was conducted at 11:45 p.m., within approximately four hours and thirty minutes of the occurrence---Furthermore, the complainant and the two injured persons were medically examined by Medical Officer within about forty minutes of the occurrence---Said remarkable promptness was not merely based on oral assertions but was duly supported by documentary evidence, including the post-mortem report of deceased and the Medico-Legal Certificates of the complainant and the injured witnesses---Timings recorded in those documents precisely corresponded with the testimony of the Medical Officers, thereby lending strong corroborative value to the prosecution's case---Medical evidence further corroborated the presence of the accused at the place of occurrence---Two accused persons were medically examined by Medical Officer, while two female accused were examined by Woman Medical Officer---Said medical examinations substantiated the commission of the offence and confirmed the presence of the accused persons at the place of occurrence---Hence, there remained no room for any suggestion of mistaken identity or denial of the occurrence at the stated venue---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English