TAUQIR AHMED vs PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR Chapter-1A (a), Volume-V, R — 2026 PLD 13 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2026 PLD 13 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court: Peshawar High Court
Year: 2026
Reporter: PLD
Parties: TAUQIR AHMED vs PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR Chapter-1A (a), Volume-V, R
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 114---C; Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

TAUQIR AHMED VS PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR Chapter-1A (a), Volume-V, R. 10(2)---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.114---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199 & 202---Constitutional petition---Rules of Procedure---Review application, filing of---Cash security, deposit of---Petitioner assailed deposit of cash security before seeking review of a judgment/order---Validity---Review is not a right and a party may request a review of Court's decision---There is no inherent right to seek review and it is upto the Court to determine whether or not to grant it---Deposit of any security amount as a pre-condition for filing a review petition does not in any manner curtail right to seek enforcement of any fundamental right---No fee or cost is imposed under R. 10(2), Chapter-1A(a), Volume-V of Peshawar High Court Rules and Orders, at the time of filing of review petition, rather it is a security deposit, which is to be returned to petitioner upon success of his petition---Such security amount is to be given to opposite party where petitioner fails after contest, so that at least some compensation is provided to the party who after being successful was again dragged into litigation before same Court---High Court declined to take any exception to Peshawar High Court Rules and Orders, made in exercise of Art. 202 of the Constitution as no writ was competent against High Court---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 PLD

2026 PLD 17 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD VS JALIL-UR-REHMAN TAREEN. art. 4…
2026 PLD 17 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD VS JALIL-UR-REHMAN TAREEN. Photos…
2026 PLD 17 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD VS JALIL-UR-REHMAN TAREEN. art. 4…
2026 PLD 17 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD VS JALIL-UR-REHMAN TAREEN. art. 4…
2026 PLD 17 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRSECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD VS JALIL-UR-REHMAN TAREEN. art. 4…
2026 PLD 12 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRAURANGZEB SIDDIQUI VS State. S. 302(b)---arms act (XX of 1965), S. 13---Qatl-i-amd, possession of illicit weapon---appreciation of evidence-…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English