Nadeem Ahmed vs Additional District Judge Islamabad (West) S — 2026 YLR 1065 ISLAMABAD

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Nadeem Ahmed VS Additional District Judge Islamabad (West) S. 25---Death of mother / wife--- Custody of minors---Father being the natural guardian---Scope---Grandmother, entitlement of--- Scope---Welfare of the minor---Scope---Petitioner / father was concurrently denied custody of minors and the same was granted to their(minors') maternal grandmother after the death of their mother (wife of petitioner)---Validity--- Muhammadan Law does indeed recognize that the father, being a natural guardian, enjoys apreferential right to the custody of his children---While the legal position under Muhammadan Law does indeed recognize the father as the natural guardianof the person and property of his minor children, such consideration/right is not unfettered or absolute---The dominant and overarching consideration in custody matters remains the "welfare of the minor", which includes physical well-being, emotional security, moral upbringing, educational needs, and overall development---In the present case, the Trial Court, after recording evidence of both parties, found that the environment in which the minors were presently residing in Islamabad was stable and conducive to their welfare--- The maternal grandmother had been looking after the minors since the death of their(minors') mother---The Courts below also took into consideration the strained relationship between the petitioner / father and his in-laws, as well as the potential safety risks involved in transferring the minors' custody to Sheikhupura, where the petitioner resides---From the perusal of the record, it emerged that the petitioner / father failed to demonstrate that he had consistently maintained contact or provided financial or emotional support to the minors after their mother's demise ; his sporadic attendance during visitation proceedings and absence of sustained interest in theireducation and upbringing did not persuade the Courts below to believe that change in custody would advance the welfare of the minors ---Petitioner, though legally entitled to visitation, could not substantiate how the custody under his care would better serve the children's best interest ---Custody decisions must not be guided by technical guardianship rights alone, but by holistic and pragmatic evaluation of each child's best interests--- Importantly, the welfare of minors cannot be assumed; it must be evidenced by conduct ---No illegality or jurisdictional error had been pointed out and the orders under challenge appeared to have been passed with due diligence, keeping in view the fundamental consideration of minor's welfare --- Constitutional petition, filed by father, was dismissed.

Nadeem Ahmed vs Additional District Judge Islamabad (West) S — 2026 YLR 1065 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR