PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Mst. Alia Rani vs The Senior Superintendent of Police, complaint cell, district West Karachi Ss — 2026 YLR 226 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2026 YLR 226 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Mst. Alia Rani vs The Senior Superintendent of Police, complaint cell, district West Karachi Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 22-

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Mst. Alia Rani VS The Senior Superintendent of Police, complaint cell, district West Karachi Ss. 22-a & 561-a---Powers of Justice of Peace under S. 22-a, Cr.P.C.---Scope---Petition filed under S. 22-a, Cr.P.C, by the petitioner for the registration of criminal case was dismissed by the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace---Validity---Petitioner alleged that proposed accused/respondents showed the compromising photos stored on her smart phone to the applicant and allegedly attempted to blackmail her to work for the proposed accused in a porn racket---During the hearing, the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace called for a report from the concerned SHO---Station House Officer twice, the first time apparently on his own and then again (second time), on the directions of the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, as recorded in the impugned order, accessed the respondent-proposed accused's smart phone---On both occasions, the record reflected that he found neither photos nor videos of the applicant in the smart phone of the proposed accused/respondent---Respondent-proposed accused also denied the allegations averred by the applicant before the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace---Ex-Officio Justice of Peace had given his reasons for rejecting the application in the impugned order, and an FIR did not need to be lodged in each and every complaint---Private parties knew each other, operating in the same locality---Information brought on record did not inspire confidence as to its bona fide---Nothing had been brought forward by the applicant side or filed any affidavit of witness in support of her claim that the respondent-proposed accused had committed any cognizable offence---No such information was available on record---as such, no defect was found in the impugned order---Petition was dismissed, accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English