Usman Ibrar vs State Ss — 2026 YLR 50 ISLAMABAD

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Usman Ibrar VS State Ss. 354-a, 342, 395, 375-a, 114, 506(ii), 509, 384, 377-B, 412 & 34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), art. 22---Outraging the modesty of a woman, wrongful confinement, dacoity or robbery committed by five or more persons, gang rape, abettor present when the offense was committed, criminal intimidation, insulting the modesty of a woman or causing sexual harassment, extortion, sexual abuse and trafficking of children, dishonest receipt or retention of property stolen during a dacoity, common intention---appreciation of evidence---Test identification parade---Scope---accused were charged for detaining a girl and a boy in an apartment while forcibly stripping them off their clothes, extending life threats and committing obscene acts with the two victims---In the present case, victims were able to identify three accused during the identification parade and assigned them with specific roles related to the crime in which victim had identified accused who had not objected to that identification parade and he had been assigned with the specific role of being stationed next to the main door responsible for the act of opening and closing it---accused at the same time confirmed his presence and referred the role of appellant---Similarly, other victim also confirmed the role of two accused persons and she had stated that one of the accused persons was witnessing the entire scene and criminal act of other co-accused including appellant---accused had not objected to this aspect, rather confirmed his presence in the incident---Other accused has not raised any objection on the identification parade---another victim had also given a similar statement against accused---Victim in her statement confirmed the role of accused who had made the video along with his description---all of the said reports supported the existing evidence on record and confirmed the acts of the appellants, who had been duly identified by the victims in three separate identification reports, demonstrated their specific roes, hence there was no doubt qua the role of each appellant if seen in juxtaposition with the statement under S.164 Cr.P.C of the victims read with the identification parade report, in which three of the appellants were duly identified---appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Usman Ibrar vs State Ss — 2026 YLR 50 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR