Pakistani case law library
Pak Law GPT gives lawyers, students and litigants access to reported Pakistani judgments in Urdu and English. Every judgment below is published from our case-law database with its original reported text, so you can read the citation and the judgment content directly.
Browse by branch of law
Reported judgments28,856 records
2022 YLR 1207 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
KARAKORUM COOPERATIVE BANK VS Mst. SOFIA BEGUM S. 42---Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 73---Suit for declaration and damages---Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract---Scope---Plaintiffs purchased a property from the def…
2022 YLR 1271 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Raja ABDULLAH KHAN VS Raja LIAQAT ALI KHAN Ss. 18 & 30---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2---Land acquisition---Interlocutory order, value of---Application for status quo order annexed with suit for declaration---Respond…
2022 YLR 1323 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUPPLY AND TRANSPORT VS Haji GHULAM MUSTAFA (deceased) Ss. 7 & 10---Suit for declaration---Petitioners/public officials invited bids---Predecessor of the respondents/plaintiffs was accepted being the lowest bidder---Respo…
2022 YLR 1323 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUPPLY AND TRANSPORT VS Haji GHULAM MUSTAFA (deceased) S.115---Powers of High Court under S. 115, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 were very limited---Revisional jurisdiction could be invoked only in the case of exercise of jur…
2022 YLR 1338 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
GUL SAFAID VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Bail, refusal of---Perusal of record revealed that the accused was directly nominated in the promptly lodged FIR with specific role of effe…
2022 YLR 1338 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
GUL SAFAID VS State S. 497---Bail---Appreciation of evidence---Scope---Deeper appreciation of evidence and circumstances appearing in the case were neither desirable nor permissible at bail stage as court would not minutely examine the meri…
2022 YLR 1466 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
KHUSH MURAD VS MALANG JAN O. XLI, R. 31---"Points for determination"---Connotation---Appellate jurisdiction--- Scope--- Provision of O. XLI, R. 31 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 was mandatory in nature and were to be followed by the Appellat…
2022 YLR 1466 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
KHUSH MURAD VS MALANG JAN arts. 117 & 118---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XLI, R. 31---Shajra akas---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction filed by respondent on grounds that he was the owner in possession of the suit land; t…
2022 YLR 1501 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
BAKHMAL SHEHZAD VS NAZEER AHMED S. 497(5)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 109 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Bail, cancellation of---Accused was directly charged in the promptly lodged FIR with specific role of effecti…
2022 YLR 1567 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
Mst. FATIMA VS DIRECTOR-GENERAL NADRA S. 42---Suit for declaration---Correction of date of birth---Evidentiary value of academic credentials---Burden of proof---Scope---Petitioner filed suit for correction of date of birth mentioned in her…
2022 YLR 1632 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
ABDUL JABAR VS MOHAMMAD ISMAIL O. XLI, R. 27---Production of additional evidence in Appellate Court---Irrelevant document---Scope---Petitioner had filed an application under O. XLI, R. 27, C.P.C. for the production of shari fitawa as additi…
2022 YLR 1977 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
GHULAM ALI SHAH VS GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN S. 34---Payment on interest---Scope---Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 provides that when amount of compensation is not deposited on or before taking possession of the land, the…
2022 YLR 1977 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
GHULAM ALI SHAH VS GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN Ss. 18 & 34---Reference to Court---Payment of interest--- Scope---Respondents acquired 8 marlas 6 sarsai commercial land of the appellant for extension and widening of a highway in December,…
2022 YLR 2002 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
IFTIKHAR AHMED VS BASHIR AHMED S. 12(2)---Bar to further suit---Sine die adjournment of execution petition---Scope---Plaintiffs instituted a suit before the Trial Court against defendant for declaration and recovery of possession of suit la…
2022 YLR 2053 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
EHSAN ALI VS AHMED ALI Ss. 337-a, 504 & 506---Shajjah---Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace---Criminal intimidation---appreciation of evidence---Scope--- Complainant assailed the acquittal of accused persons by the…
2022 YLR 2082 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
REHMAT KHALIQ VS State Ss. 497 & 169---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324 & 337-F(v)---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd--- Ghayr-jaifah---Hashimah--- Bail, grant of--- Discharge of co-accused persons--- Rule of consistency--- Absconsion--- Recov…
2022 YLR 2082 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
REHMAT KHALIQ VS State S. 497---Bail---Further inquiry---Absconsion---Scope---When the case calls for further inquiry into the guilt of the accused person, bail is to be allowed to him as of right and not by way of grace, and in such a case…
2022 YLR 2148 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
JAN ALAM VS State S. 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 471 & 468---Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), S. 5---Criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent---Using as genuine a forged document---F…
2022 YLR 2343 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GILGIT VS MUHAMMAD ISSA O. VIII, R. 10---Written statement, right to file---Petitioner/defendant filed appeal against Trial Court's order to stuck off the right to file written statement which was dismissed---R…
2022 YLR 2376 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
GHULAM ABBAS VS HAZRA KHAN Justice demands that valuable rights of the parties need to be agitated upon merits rather than dismissing the matter on technical grounds.
2022 YLR 2376 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
GHULAM ABBAS VS HAZRA KHAN arts. 168 & 181---Dismissal of appeal/ Miscellaneous Petition for want of prosecution--- Limitation--- Scope--- article 168 of Limitation act, 1908 applies to readmission of an appeal dismissed for want of prosecu…
2022 YLR 2423 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GILGIT VS ABDUL WAHID art. 86---Writ petition---Infructuous matter--- Maintainability--- Scope---Petitioners assailed order passed by Trial Court whereby their right to file written statement was struck off---R…
2022 YLR 2423 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GILGIT VS ABDUL WAHID S. 115--- Revision petition---Second revision petition--- Maintainability---Scope---Where petitioner had filed revision petition against an order passed in civil first appeal converted int…
2022 PLD 1 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR S. 5---azad Government of the State of Jammu and Kashmir Rules of Business, 1985, R. 23---azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution act (VIII of 1974), arts. 44 &…
2022 PLD 1 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Courts cannot interfere in the domain of other institutions or authorities, unless they travel beyond their constitutional or legal domain.
2022 PLD 1 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR S. 31---azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution act (VIII of 1974), arts. 44, 24 & 4(15)---Writ petition---Qualification of members of assembly---Equality of St…
2022 PLD 1 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR If any fault is found in the legislation, the Courts are not competent to rectify such fault, rather, it is the sole responsibility of Legislature to rectify the sa…
2022 PLD 1 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Legislature is competent to make a law and it has ample powers of legislation.
2022 PLD 1 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
Mian MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE VS AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR Vires of statute---Scope---Court should lean towards the constitutionality of a legislative enactment instead of destroying it, keeping in view the rule of constitu…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION art. 44---General Clauses act (X of 1897), S. 24-a---If the public functionaries fail to act within the parameters of S. 24-a of…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Public functionaries must act honestly, fairly in matters of contracts regarding public interest.
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Reversal of a validly issued legal instrument which creates certain rights in favour of other party and in furtherance of some d…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Discretionary jurisdiction---Principles detailed.
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Public functionaries dealing with rights and obligations of persons are required to give valid reasons in their orders which are…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Government functionaries have to act fairly, justly, equitably and reasonably.
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION art. 44---Writ petition---Maintainability---Scope---Modern and progressive juristic approach regarding maintainability of consti…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION art. 44---Writ petition---Maintainability---Scope---Where allegations are based on statutory rules and other legal documents for…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Law requires performance of an act in a way as it is prescribed otherwise performance of the same is nullity.
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Deviation of law gives birth to concept of club law and lawlessness.
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Public functionaries are under legal obligation to decide controversies between the parties with reasons.
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Every citizen has to be dealt with in accordance with law and not on the basis of whims and caprice of the executive authorities…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION arts. 44, 4(4)(1) & 4(4)(19)---General Clauses act (X of 1897), S.24-a---Security of person---Right to fair trial---Reasons for…
2022 PLD 61 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
RIAZ FURNISHERS (PVT.) LTD. VS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHYSICAL PLANNING AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE DIVISION Law does not allow issuance of any rigmorale and zigzag issuance of orders.
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN S. 42---Suit for declaration---Co-sharer---Scope---Every co-sharer is deemed to be the owner of every piece and parcel of the land unless the same is regularly partitioned.
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN Courts have to decide the cases on the basis of pleadings of the parties and material propositions raised, in the light of proof brought on record.
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN Fraud vitiates all solemn proceedings.
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN arts. 113 & 133---Facts admitted need not be proved---Cross-examination---Scope---admitted facts need not to be proved and material disposition remaining un-challenged in cross-examination amounts…
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN No limitation runs against a person who was not a party to the proceedings, which adversely affects his rights---Question of limitation is applicable against that party who is contesting the claim…
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN O. VIII, R. 5---Specific denial---Scope---Every allegation of fact in the plaint, if not denied specifically or by necessary implication or not traversed (denied expressly) or stated to be admitted…
2022 PLD 72 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR
MOHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN VS MOHAMMAD AZAM KHAN S. 107, O. XLI, Rr. 33 & 24---Powers of appellate Court---Where evidence on record is sufficient, appellate Court may determine case finally---Scope---appeal is continuation of the suit and under S…
Looking for a specific point of law? Search the case-law database in Urdu or English.