Citation Name: 2024 MLD 1878 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Shah Zaman vs State S — 2024 MLD 1878 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2024 MLD 1878 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: MLD
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 MLD 1878 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Shah Zaman vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 MLD 1878 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Shah Zaman VS State S. 497(2)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 377 & 34---Unnatural offence, common intention---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Prosecution case was that the complainant was subjected to sodomy by three persons in the baithak of applicant---In his statement recorded under Section 164, Cr.P.C, victim had narrated the incident in graphic details---Incident took place on 22.04.2024 while FIR was lodged on 24.04.2024 and complainant was also examined on the same day---According to the medical report, which was done promptly after lodging of the crime, no injury, bruise, laceration and tear mark was seen around the anus---First Information Report was lodged after two days of the occurrence and no plausible justification had been given for the same---Neither the applicant was accompanying the principle accused at the time of forcibly removing the complainant from the park with the house of applicant nor had he committed sodomy with the complainant---Possibility could not be ruled out that the FIR was registered with deliberation and consultation in order to frame the applicant---No useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars for an indefinite period till the conclusion of the trial---Case of the applicant squarely fell within the ambit of S.497(2), Cr.P.C, entitling for further inquiry into his guilt---Applicant was admitted to bail, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 MLD

2024 MLD 608 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHRamesh Kumar VS State Benefit of doubt---While giving the benefit of doubt to an accused it is not necessary that there should be many circu…
2024 MLD 474 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMOHAMMAD DANISH REHMANI VS State Ss.302, 119, 109 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S.7---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)--…
2024 MLD 1359 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBehram Jakhro VS State Ss. 498 & 497---Cancellation of bail---Principles for cancellation/recalling of bail---Bail may be cancelled (i) if t…
2024 MLD 1237 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHZulfiqar Ahmed VS Muhammad Nadeem Purpose---at times, while lodging of criminal cases, wider net is cast to implicate an accused including o…
2024 MLD 862 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Ali VS State Ss. 324 & 353--- Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 23 (1)(a)--- attempt to qatl-i-amd, police encounter and recovery of f…
2024 MLD 1394 Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtMoatabar Khan VS Zaheer Abbas S. 497(5)---Cancellation of bail---Grounds---Bail may be cancelled (i) if bail granting order is patently ille…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English