PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

NIAZ HUSSAIN vs FAZAL FAREED Ss — 2026 CLC 802 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2026 CLC 802 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
CLC
Parties
NIAZ HUSSAIN vs FAZAL FAREED Ss
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 13

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

NIAZ HUSSAIN VS FAZAL FAREED Ss.13, 14 & 115---Foreign money decree---Suit for recovery in Pakistan, filing of---Foreign judgment as cause of action---Scope---Brief facts were that the respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 22,62,244/- (71, 594 Saudi Riyal) against the petitioner / defendant, arising out of a business/work arrangement in Saudi Arabia culminating in a money decree passed by acompetent court at Makkah al-Mukarramah in favour of the plaintiffs; the trial court decreed the recovery suit; the petitioner's/defendant's appeal was dismissed by the District Court; and the petitioner then filed the present civil revision challenging those concurrent judgments/decrees---Issue requiring determination before the High Court was as to "whether, in view of the foreign money decree and the scheme of Ss. 13 & 14, C.P.C., the plaintiffs/respondents were entitled to recover the decretal amount from the petitioner in Pakistan through filing of the civil suit---Held: Admittedly, a civil lis was instituted against the petitioner / defendant in the competent Court at Makkah al-Mukarramah and the petitioner joined the proceeding before the said Court, submitted his available defenses and thereafter a decree was passed against him and same was still intact as it was not challenged by him---Once he had submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court at Makkah al-Mukarramah without any objection, thereafter the decision rendered by the said Court was binding---Under S.13, C.P.C. the process of foreign decree was provided and under Ss. 13 & 14 C.P.C. the presumption of validity/truth was attached to the foreign decree---The concurrent findings of fact were against the petitioner/defendant which did not call for any interference by the High Court in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction---Civil revision petition was dismissed with special costs, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2026 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English