PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Qadir Bux Khaskheli vs The Senior Superintendent of Police, Thatta Ss — 2026 YLR 562 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2026 YLR 562 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2026
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Qadir Bux Khaskheli vs The Senior Superintendent of Police, Thatta Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 22-; S. 154

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Qadir Bux Khaskheli VS The Senior Superintendent of Police, Thatta Ss. 561-a & 22-a---Powers of Justice of Peace under S.22-a, Cr.P.C.---Scope---Petition filed under S. 22-a, Cr.P.C, by the complainant/ respondent for the registration of criminal case against applicant and others was allowed by the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace---Validity---Complainant, had vividly described the alleged incident---Complainant had also assigned the role of each of the proposed accused, viz., each injured person and the mode used (butt of gun blows, lathi blows, fists and kicks, physical pushing, etc.)---Medico-Legal Officer Certificate in issue concerned injury to a woman with an apparently hard and blunt weapon---Other women were also alleged to be victims in the incident---Ingredients of the crime were not limited to physical hurt alone---Even if the applicant/proposed accused took the defence that the incident was merely a squabble or bickering, yet it was not denied that such an incident involved womenfolk, which in itself called for inquiry from a gender perspective, and depending on the outcome of such investigation, might or might not be involved offence against women, which were cognizable---additionally, the allegation by the complainant/ respondent that the proposed accused forcibly entered his home without permission was not denied, either---Point was, it was too early to say, and the matter required the recording of statement under S.154, Cr.P.C. and depending on that, if an offence was made out, then the lodging of FIR, and if the claims were false, then further course of action might be taken, as articulated in the impugned Order---There was no defect in the order passed by the Ex-Officio Justice of Peace, and no illegality, irregularity, or legal oversight were found in the impugned order---Consequently, Criminal Miscellaneous application was dismissed, accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2026 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English